|
4 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Wednesday 12/27/17 - 6:36:58 PM EST (GMT-5)
It is not.
|
|
4 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Wednesday 12/27/17 - 6:47:35 PM EST (GMT-5)
no.
I'm going to be so embarrassed next week when my answer is wrong.
|
|
4 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Wednesday 12/27/17 - 6:48:58 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 12/27/17 - 6:47:35 PM mousepelled wrote: no. I'm going to be so embarrassed next week when my answer is wrong. |
But so pleased in 53 weeks when it is right again!
|
|
4 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Wednesday 12/27/17 - 9:37:52 PM EST (GMT-5)
true
|
|
4 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Thursday 12/28/17 - 1:26:48 AM EST (GMT-5)
It's always 2018 somewhere!?!?
amrite?
|
|
4 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Monday 1/1/18 - 1:17:47 PM EST (GMT-5)
It is.
|
|
4 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Monday 1/1/18 - 9:26:52 PM EST (GMT-5)
no
|
|
4 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 2/25/18 - 12:39:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
it's 1972
|
|
4 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 2/25/18 - 12:40:21 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/1/18 - 9:26:52 PM brandon00 wrote: no |
i love you
|
|
4 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Wednesday 3/7/18 - 10:40:16 PM EST (GMT-5)
not quite
|
|
3 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Saturday 10/6/18 - 5:46:05 PM EST (GMT-5)
It still is.
|
|
3 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Tuesday 10/9/18 - 11:12:45 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Saturday 10/6/18 - 5:46:05 PM peledavid16 wrote: It still is. |
potato!
|
|
69x
Male,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 13 yrs, 5 mos ago
1,339 Posts
|
|
|
3 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Tuesday 10/16/18 - 4:23:41 AM EST (GMT-5)
No it's 2019
|
|
3 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Thursday 10/18/18 - 1:41:24 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Tuesday 10/16/18 - 4:23:41 AM 69x wrote: No it's 2019 |
y u liez?
|
|
69x
Male,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 13 yrs, 5 mos ago
1,339 Posts
|
|
|
3 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Thursday 10/18/18 - 8:37:52 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Tuesday 10/16/18 - 4:23:41 AM 69x wrote: No it's 2019 |
On Thursday 10/18/18 - 1:41:24 PM peledavid16 wrote: y u liez? |
Ok buy in other countries like china its like the tear 4019 or something
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 7:15:43 PM EST (GMT-5)
No.
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 7:16:28 PM EST (GMT-5)
Yes.
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 7:56:03 PM EST (GMT-5)
No!
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 7:56:35 PM EST (GMT-5)
yes it is
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 10:41:56 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 12/31/18 - 7:56:35 PM skyfish wrote: yes it is |
Liar!
|
|
3 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 12/31/18 - 11:04:03 PM EST (GMT-5)
82 percent of 90 answers say yes.
in order to maintain the integrity of this site we must reverse this.
so...
82 percent of 90 is equal to 73.8 votes.
so in order to create 82 percent yes we need...
we have 16.2 votes so...
(16.2+x) / (90+x) = 0.82
16.2+x = 73.8 + .82x
.18x = 57.6
x=320 votes
we need 320 people to vote yes in order to undue this hypocrisy.
(320 + 16.2)/(320 + 90) =
336.2/410 =
0.82
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/l...
that's the graphical representation.
we must correct this error however.
are there even 320 people on the site anymore.
call your friends. we have to fix the future.
|
|
Wolf_In_Jar
Male,
18-29
Eastern US
Joined: 12 yrs, 5 mos ago
8,655 Posts
|
|
|
3 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Tuesday 1/1/19 - 12:20:10 PM EST (GMT-5)
I mean no you have to vote no.
|
|
3 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Tuesday 1/1/19 - 2:14:39 PM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
3 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Tuesday 1/1/19 - 2:21:27 PM EST (GMT-5)
for the record, the graph determines that in order to achieve a simple victory of 51 percent no votes we need a total of 62 no votes with 0 additional yes votes.
i already voted yes on my other account by the way.
i just voted no on this account. 61 additional no votes are necessary.
|
|
Wolf_In_Jar
Male,
18-29
Eastern US
Joined: 12 yrs, 5 mos ago
8,655 Posts
|
|
|
3 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Thursday 1/3/19 - 1:57:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
That’s two more no votes!
Good job!
|