Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

902 hits 4.0 (2 votes) Share Favorite | Flag 13 years ago by KikiPeepers

Do you think it's wrong for a woman to have a C-section for the purpose of not ruining her vagina?


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Prev 1 2 Next (showing 1-25 of 35)

Bottom Last Post

13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 2:09:48 AM EST (GMT-5)
nope. i don't see anything wrong with that.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 2:40:00 AM EST (GMT-5)
Yes, because she's working on faulty information.

Vaginal childbirth doesn't "ruin" the vagina.

I've given birth vaginally to two full-term children. Nothing wrong with my vagina.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:42:13 AM EST (GMT-5)

Psst!
Secret: That's what it was meant for!
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 6:26:53 AM EST (GMT-5)
I don't think there's anything immoral about it. In fact it seems like a less stressful experience for the child and the mother.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 7:54:13 AM EST (GMT-5)
No, I don't think it's wrong...I think that a woman should give birth any way she wants.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 8:31:23 AM EST (GMT-5)
I think it is selfish and potentially putting the child at risk needlessly. C-sections have certainly saved many children but when everything is running smoothly, babies are designed to be born vaginally.

Also what Wanderer said, I just haven't had children.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 8:33:45 AM EST (GMT-5)
Yes that is ridiculous...

C-sections have there uses trust me I'm grateful for mine but if the circumstances were any different there is no way I'd just have a c- section for the hell of it, to save my vagina...
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 8:35:02 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 4/22/09 - 6:26:53 AM qwfwq wrote:
I don't think there's anything immoral about it. In fact it seems like a less stressful experience for the child and the mother.

It's actually more stressful on the baby as the baby doesn't initially always breath straightaway from a c- section... with a vaginal birth you find as you take your last push the baby takes it's first breath as its coming on.....
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 9:00:44 AM EST (GMT-5)
No, it's not.

Plenty of people are born by C-sections and turn out perfectly fine and healthy.
But there's a very good chance her vagina will be completely normal afterward, so it's her call.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 10:24:08 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 4/22/09 - 2:40:00 AM Wanderer wrote:
Yes, because she's working on faulty information. Vaginal childbirth doesn't "ruin" the vagina. I've given birth vaginally to two full-term children. Nothing wrong with my vagina.


It stretches it though, so you aren't tight anymore. Some women have to have surgery to correct that, or they become incontinent ... babies can really mess a body up! And someone it can even tear your taint! Nothing bigger than a dick is ever going in or out of there on me
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 10:44:07 AM EST (GMT-5)
It's as good a reason as any.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 11:49:22 AM EST (GMT-5)
Wrong? They should have the right to do it how they want.

The whole 'natural childbirth' thing scares me to death, I think it's disgusting... how people say it's beautiful I do NOT know!
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 11:58:04 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 4/22/09 - 2:40:00 AM Wanderer wrote:
Yes, because she's working on faulty information. Vaginal childbirth doesn't "ruin" the vagina. I've given birth vaginally to two full-term children. Nothing wrong with my vagina.
the average vaginally delivery will stretch it permanently out half an inch further than normal
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 12:01:26 PM EST (GMT-5)
No.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 12:29:30 PM EST (GMT-5)
It's not wrong at all. Woman's choice!
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 1:39:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 4/22/09 - 11:49:22 AM doyleyjr wrote:
Wrong? They should have the right to do it how they want. The whole 'natural childbirth' thing scares me to death, I think it's disgusting... how people say it's beautiful I do NOT know!


I know ... I don't know how something that can cause SO much damage (my baby sister broke my mom's tailbone on her way out) is natural. I mean, obviously women have done this since the dawn of time, but it seems so ... alien ... to me.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:12:03 PM EST (GMT-5)
C-sections are a man's best friend.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:16:45 PM EST (GMT-5)
If she's afraid she gonna swallow a barstool the next time she sits on it, I say have the C-Section.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:30:12 PM EST (GMT-5)
When I was born my skull was fully formed, no soft spot, plus I weighed nearly nine pounds (and I was a month early!). Anyway, my mom's nethers were torn up so bad that she's had to be treated repeatedly for the wound opening up again, plus she's incontinent.
There is no way I am going to risk that if I don't have to.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:55:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
That desicion should be for the mother to make.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 6:06:35 PM EST (GMT-5)
Ruined vagina=*long silence*
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 6:32:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
Women had babies vaginally for a LONG time before C-sections came around. I can see doing it if it is necessary to save the baby, but I can't see just choosing to do it because you're afraid your vagina won't be the same.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 7:21:01 PM EST (GMT-5)
It does seem rather vain, and selfish if it is putting the baby at risk.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 4/22/09 - 9:24:22 PM EST (GMT-5)
Babies who are born naturally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from the mother that help the immune system of the child; so children born by mothers wanting a perfect vagina have an increased food allergy risk of 106%, and increased risk of infant diarrhea of 46%. Also, when children are born naturally they are exposed to oxygen better and can breathe easier making it a safer birth. If a woman wants a child but is more concerned about her own body than a life she created, she is completely missing the point of being a mother.
13 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Thursday 4/23/09 - 4:33:13 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 4/22/09 - 5:12:03 PM j0ker18 wrote:
C-sections are a man's best friend.


God, stfu

I guess if she had a vapid dipsh*t for a husband like you who thinks that childbirth and motherhood destroys your precious sex life, no wonder why there are so many women worried about stretching their vaginas.

And really, if you don't enjoy sex with your wife after having a kid, there are more problems than her vagina, pal.

So many shallow idiots.

Maybe women wouldn't be as worried about superficial sh*t if people didn't say sh*t like this.

Grow up.

Prev 1 2 Next (showing 1-25 of 35)



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 What does your money do?

2 If you had a genetic disease, would you reproduce?

3 Do you live in a home that has been owned by your family for multiple generations?

4 Do you ever leave your dog in your vehicle with the windows rolled down a bit?

5 How do you pronounce the word 'Italian'?

6 Have you ever won a radio competition?

7 Have you ever seen an Aurora?

8 If a defendant is found `not guilty`, do you assume that they are innocent?

9 Do people become more likeable once they`ve realized their faults?

10 Does your favourite movie pass the Bechdel test?

More Questions
 
Edit