Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

487 hits 4.0 (1 vote) Share Favorite | Flag 13 years ago by KikiPeepers

Which do you think is more likely to exist: Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster?


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Bottom Last Post

13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 5:05:05 PM EST (GMT-5)
to be honest with you, i dont think either one exists.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 5:05:22 PM EST (GMT-5)
bigfoot
i don't know why, but yeah
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 5:44:16 PM EST (GMT-5)
I don't believe in either, but I think that the Loch Ness Monster is more likely. I don't know why, but there are a lot of underwater creatures that we don't know that much about. We are more likely to have an underwater creature that is unknown/undiscovered than a land creature.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 5:59:19 PM EST (GMT-5)
Old nessie.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 6:35:13 PM EST (GMT-5)
Nessie is more likely, partly for the reason pink said. However I doubt that Nessie is real.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 6:43:34 PM EST (GMT-5)
I'm a bigfoot supporter
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 9:42:52 PM EST (GMT-5)
bigfoot
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Monday 8/18/08 - 11:00:48 PM EST (GMT-5)
Bigfoot. I don't believe in either, but if Bigfoot does exist, I always thought that it would be some kind of deformed human that was abandoned at birth, forced to to fend for itself in the cruel forests.

Me and my crazy stories.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 8/19/08 - 12:26:31 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 8/18/08 - 11:00:48 PM die_numb wrote:
Bigfoot. I don't believe in either, but if Bigfoot does exist, I always thought that it would be some kind of deformed human that was abandoned at birth, forced to to fend for itself in the cruel forests. Me and my crazy stories.

I don't support either but I if I am forced to choose nessie-mostly because of what pink said. But IF bigfoot is real I think all he is is just a big imported Deformed Gorilla thing.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 8/19/08 - 8:41:58 AM EST (GMT-5)
OMG, Nessie. But Bigfoot's packin' some serious hair, man. YUM.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 8/19/08 - 9:21:29 AM EST (GMT-5)
I agree with pink about why the Loch Ness Monster is more likely, but I still don't believe in either.
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 8/19/08 - 9:56:00 AM EST (GMT-5)
well, they found bigfoot, so...
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 8/19/08 - 10:36:32 AM EST (GMT-5)
I'd say bigfoot, since he is semi-similar to currently existing animals, like gorillas and stuff
And also because of the Yeti legends that are somewhat similar
13 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Wednesday 8/20/08 - 2:54:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
Nessie. Nobody could ever prove Bigfoot exists after so many hoaxes, like the recent Bigfoot costume in a freezer stunt. The skeptics just grow in number...
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 3:00:38 PM EST (GMT-5)
I dont believe in neither but if i had to choose I would choose nessi because we dont really know what is at the bottom of the sea and bigfoot has been a hoax for soooo long and nessie could actually be at the bottom of the ocean but I seriously doubt it.
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 3:33:03 PM EST (GMT-5)
Bigfoot. There is a lot of woods to look through. The Loch Ness is.. just a lake isn't it? I'm not sure but it seems it would be easier to find the Loch Ness monster with all the crazy water science we have.
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 4:26:29 PM EST (GMT-5)
Nessie. It's a lot easier to hide under water than on land.
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 4:40:59 PM EST (GMT-5)
I think that the lockness monster is more likely. And besides, how else would we be able to get pictures of this creature? The dragons and all that really did exist at one time. But bigfoot is probably fake because we dont really have pics, it could have been someone's imagination, and so i think that my answer is the lockness monster. (This is just my opinion)
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 4:56:03 PM EST (GMT-5)
Bigfoot. The Loch Ness Monster would not have enough food to live, let alone procreate and have offspring capable of surviving with so little food.
There's a reason animals like megalodon went extinct, they're too big.
At least with Bigfoot, it's somewhat plausible for it to be able to survive.

On Friday 9/12/08 - 4:40:59 PM Shiloh1314 wrote:
I think that the lockness monster is more likely. And besides, how else would we be able to get pictures of this creature? The dragons and all that really did exist at one time. But bigfoot is probably fake because we dont really have pics, it could have been someone's imagination, and so i think that my answer is the lockness monster. (This is just my opinion)

The Loch Ness Monster can't be a result of someone's overactive imagination as well?
13 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/08 - 7:17:55 PM EST (GMT-5)
I agree with Kaiser. Ness would be too big. I would agree that Ness was more likely if he were spotted in, say, the ocean. But Loch Ness? No way.

Btw, I think a satellite was run over Loch Ness and it didn't find anything. Saw it on some tv show a while back.
13 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Monday 3/16/09 - 2:48:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
They have seen Bigfoot critters in many states an by hundreds or thousands of people, some of them cops and forest rangers. Also many people have heard unexplained howls and even had rocks thrown at them by something when they were in the middle of nowhere. Also tracks, lots of tracks have been found that could not be explained by some other creature. They cant all be lies and hoaxes we are talking sightings going back to native american times.
12 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Tuesday 1/12/10 - 1:43:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
I knew the girl wasn't dead!

Loch Ness monster death rumours dismissed
12 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Tuesday 1/12/10 - 1:49:56 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Friday 9/12/08 - 7:17:55 PM JadedDiamond wrote:
I agree with Kaiser. Ness would be too big. I would agree that Ness was more likely if he were spotted in, say, the ocean. But Loch Ness? No way. Btw, I think a satellite was run over Loch Ness and it didn't find anything. Saw it on some tv show a while back.


there are proven underground tunnels that lead to the open ocean but not enough food in Loch Ness to support a large animal. Radar has shown things about 6ft long moving around and they suggest giant sturgeon may pass by during certain seasons and may have influenced the myth.

Famous 'dinosaur' pics like above have pretty much all been shown to be hoaxes.
10 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Saturday 9/17/11 - 4:02:16 PM EST (GMT-5)
nessie because in a guys will the one who claimed of finding Bigfoots foot thingy he started the rumor he admit in his will he was in a costume!!!



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 What does your money do?

2 If you had a genetic disease, would you reproduce?

3 Should the clock have been shifted 6 hours when it was designed, so that dawn occurs at approximately 12:00 and each hour corresponds to an hour of daylight?

4 Do you live in a home that has been owned by your family for multiple generations?

5 Have you ever seen an Aurora?

6 Do people become more likeable once they`ve realized their faults?

7 Should Christians do yoga?

8 Does your favourite movie pass the Bechdel test?

9 Is it fair that this woman got away with purposefully miscarrying her two babies?

10 Have you sent a postcard into PostSecret?

More Questions
 
Edit