Susan Sarandon wants the U.S. presidential elections to be monitored by outside interests. The “Bull Durham” star says that the 2004 vote was so fraudulent that we need international oversight — like troubled third-world countries do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12096127 Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

793 hits Rate me! Share Favorite | Flag 16 years ago by KikiPeepers

Should U.S. presidential elections be monitored by outside interests, like other troubled countries do?
Susan Sarandon wants the U.S. presidential elections to be monitored by outside interests. The “Bull Durham” star says that the 2004 vote was so fraudulent that we need international oversight — like troubled third-world countries do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1209612...


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Bottom Last Post

15 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/23/06 - 1:53:47 AM EST (GMT-5)
Well, I do and don't agree with Susan Sarandon. I believe she was just throwing a bitch fit b/c the candidate in whom she favored did not win.

And we know where this is going:

To prevent cheating, which I *do* agree with.

15 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/23/06 - 1:57:42 AM EST (GMT-5)
I don't see how it could hurt.
15 yrs ago, 10 mos ago - Tuesday 7/25/06 - 2:52:07 AM EST (GMT-5)
That would be nice for all countries I think.
15 yrs ago, 10 mos ago - Tuesday 7/25/06 - 11:05:00 AM EST (GMT-5)
I'm not sure "outside interests" is the correct phrase - it suggests those from outside support one or other of the candidates. External adjudication seems a good idea, though. It would save Americans from themselves - prevent a repeat of the accidental election of G.W.Bush.
15 yrs ago, 10 mos ago - Tuesday 7/25/06 - 11:09:15 AM EST (GMT-5)
"prevent a repeat of the accidental election of G.W.Bush."

#16

You guys are funny.

15 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Friday 8/18/06 - 9:02:38 AM EST (GMT-5)
On 7/25/2006 11:05:00 AM neil733 wrote:
I'm not sure "outside interests" is the correct phrase - it suggests those from outside support one or other of the candidates. External adjudication seems a good idea, though. It would save Americans from themselves - prevent a repeat of the accidental election of G.W.Bush.

But would anyone listen to them if they did say it was rigged?

15 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Wednesday 9/6/06 - 10:46:17 PM EST (GMT-5)
They say that it was rigged afterwards. They would be there to make sure that it wasn't rigged.



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 What does your money do?

2 If you had a genetic disease, would you reproduce?

3 Should the clock have been shifted 6 hours when it was designed, so that dawn occurs at approximately 12:00 and each hour corresponds to an hour of daylight?

4 Do you live in a home that has been owned by your family for multiple generations?

5 Have you ever seen an Aurora?

6 Do people become more likeable once they`ve realized their faults?

7 Should Christians do yoga?

8 Does your favourite movie pass the Bechdel test?

9 Is it fair that this woman got away with purposefully miscarrying her two babies?

10 You're proving my point?

More Questions
 
Edit