If men only gave birth to other men and women only gave birth to other women then...yeah!

Bring it on!

We'd win anyway!

yep, and the females would win

wtf, I've posted the same question on here worded differently. How did this get through?

No. In fact, there would be more peace between them. Men and women would not need each other, so we'd all be on our separate ways. There could only be a struggle when there is something one wants from the other.

women would win cause we only get emotionally unstable if we are in relationships with men...no men = kick ass women

would we fight?? i assume so cause of scarcity of natural resources

On 7/15/2005 2:47:24 PM botan_870 wrote: yep, and the females would win

In your dreams. I would be gay then and still be with women though.

Yeh and the men would difenately win. We women are weak.

On 7/15/2005 2:47:24 PM botan_870 wrote: yep, and the females would win

Well, the right pictures shows two men with a female baby. I'm guessing if each sex was able to give birth to the opposite sex then there wouldn't be too much of a battle.

If most (meaning that gay and straight switched statistics) men were with men and most women were with women I think there would be harmony in the world in general. Couples would have an easier time understanding one and another.

As to which gender would win if there were a battle I suppose it would matter what type of battle it was. If it were hand to hand combat men would obviously have an advantage. If it were more strategical men and women would be on a more equal footing and it would just depend on the specific people fighting.

Not necessarily, but that kind of reproductive isolation would mean that men and women were technically different species.

On 7/15/2005 3:05:37 PM matthewsim88 wrote: wtf, I've posted the same question on here worded differently. How did this get through?

Oh relax. It's just that I'm so much better than you is all.

"Well, the right pictures shows two men with a female baby."

You don't know that. Those guys are probably homos, and you know how we like to convert children!

I actually thought of saying something like "maybe they're starting the cross dressing early" ha.

If suddenly men could only procreate with men and women with women then technically wouldn't men and women then be different species, albeit ones with a recent common ancestry?
So does anybody here think they could share the Earth with another intelligent, tool-making, industrial species without going to war?

On 11/4/2005 12:10:40 PM Wahey wrote: If suddenly men could only procreate with men and women with women then technically wouldn't men and women then be different species, albeit ones with a recent common ancestry? So does anybody here think they could share the Earth with another intelligent, tool-making, industrial species without going to war?

That's a better wording of what I intended with the question.

no i dont think so. who thinks this stuff up tho lol?

i dunno never gave it much thought

On 7/15/2005 2:47:24 PM botan_870 wrote: yep, and the females would win

lol, rubbish.

Then straight would be like how gay is today.
Wouldn't it be funny to live in a world where people were against hetrosexuality.

Afraid to say that women would have been gone a long time ago what with centuries past where they had very very few rights and were see as only useful for birth. Wahey has an extremely good point.

On 7/15/2005 2:47:24 PM botan_870 wrote: yep, and the females would win

That's a funny thing you said there.

If it was that way from the begining of human history definately. We haven't exactly been peaceful. One would have exterminated the other or we would have killed each other off.

i agree with lonewolf. it would truly be a battle of the sexes because we would view eachother alot like how the whites viewed the blacks back in the civil war. onne would think the other inferior and it would be mass chaos.

I don't think there would be a "war", exactly, we'd just be more alienated from each other.

And the fact that you can procreate with a group doesn't mean that you sexually desire them. Even if women could only mate with each other, it wouldn't mean they'd all be attracted to each other. Some women might still need the company of men for sexual purposes.

I think the women would win