|
|
17 yrs ago - Tuesday 4/26/05 - 3:46:51 PM EST (GMT-5)
I think it's a GREAT idea.
|
|
monkeys2
Male,
18-29
Europe
Joined: 17 yrs, 2 mos ago
256 Posts
|
|
|
|
17 yrs ago - Tuesday 4/26/05 - 3:48:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
can you get an overdraft of DNA ? What happens when you cash a DNA check? Do they charge late fees?
|
|
3251966
Male,
30-39
Western US
Joined: 17 yrs ago
237 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 10 mos ago - Monday 7/4/05 - 7:30:30 AM EST (GMT-5)
No, that is WAY too big-brotherish for me!
|
|
jungman
Male,
30-39
Europe
Joined: 16 yrs, 9 mos ago
396 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 7/26/05 - 12:14:32 PM EST (GMT-5)
The government work for the people - kick them out! Who the hell do they think they are?
|
|
BabyStewie
Female,
13-17
Europe
Joined: 16 yrs, 10 mos ago
791 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 7/26/05 - 5:46:44 PM EST (GMT-5)
No, DNA may be unique for everyone (apart from twins) but they only look for a few points, which are not unique, there was a case of a paralised man getting arrested for a burglery on a top floor flat (breaking in through the window) because he had simular DNA to the person who did it, (his DNA was on record for a crime many years previously)
|
|
yankees15
Male,
40-49
Eastern US
Joined: 19 yrs, 11 mos ago
3,512 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Tuesday 7/26/05 - 5:50:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
Absolutely.
We have the technlogy available, not only to solve crimes more efficiently, but also to exhonorate those wrongly convicted. Why not use it?
|
|
|
BabyStewie
Female,
13-17
Europe
Joined: 16 yrs, 10 mos ago
791 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Thursday 7/28/05 - 5:56:33 PM EST (GMT-5)
grrr, big brother... evil
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 9 mos ago - Friday 7/29/05 - 4:44:26 AM EST (GMT-5)
No, and what the hell is thing coming towards the eye in the pic? It's giving me the creeps!
|
|
guapodude
Male,
70+
Southern US
Joined: 16 yrs, 8 mos ago
14,786 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Thursday 12/8/05 - 4:11:12 PM EST (GMT-5)
Yes, I have nothing to hide.
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Thursday 12/8/05 - 4:14:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
On 12/8/2005 4:11:12 PM guapodude wrote:
Yes, I have nothing to hide. |
Me either.
Though it IS sort of creepy. |
|
|
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Thursday 12/8/05 - 4:15:14 PM EST (GMT-5)
Sure. So long as they only take the DNA of convicted criminals. I sure as hell don't want them having my DNA on file. I even faked it in my military medical record, saying they had it when in fact I never sent it in.
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Thursday 12/8/05 - 4:22:00 PM EST (GMT-5)
Sounds like a good idea.
Maybe.
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Saturday 12/24/05 - 5:54:45 PM EST (GMT-5)
Anyone convicted of a violent crime should have its DNA sampled, only if it's to make it available to all levels of law enforcement in the country. the competition between the different levels of law enforcement is way too high. And DNA sampling the population, no: too Orwellish and too expensive. |
|
allisonl_1
Female,
18-29
Canada
Joined: 16 yrs, 5 mos ago
157 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Saturday 12/24/05 - 6:02:20 PM EST (GMT-5)
Most convicted criminals already have DNA on file (serious crimes), which makes me think that this prposition would be directed at the rest of us, not the dangerous criminals. I agree, Big Brother, creepy.
|
|
xposer
Female,
13-17
Midwest US
Joined: 16 yrs, 9 mos ago
1,366 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 1/1/06 - 3:36:31 AM EST (GMT-5)
But then more faith lies in the government, and if a mix-up of the lab results or anything were to ever occur, it could be a drastic nightmare for the occused who might be innocent
|
Share 
