Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

617 hits Rate me! Share Favorite | Flag 16 years ago by ohlefty

Does moral order bring political order?


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Bottom Last Post

16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Wednesday 4/20/05 - 1:11:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
No, there is no such thing as political order and there is no such thing as moral order. Morals and politics change over time, sometimes they form so as to coincide nicely and well with each other and other times they cause nothing but harm as politics tries to dictate what is moral. Someday people will realize that morals are not black and white, there are gray areas where the morals are changing and these areas will affect others and when that happens the whole world will be shaken. Trying to have one set of morals, like the Ten Commandments, for everyone is just not possible. As long as there is more than one human there will be more than one set of morals.
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Wednesday 4/20/05 - 1:15:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
If we had perfect moral order, just being hypothetical, then that would mean each person would be 'perfectly moral', considering there ARE morals. If everyone was perfectly moral, then that would include politicians, right? So one would think that moral order would bring about political order.
However, morals and politics are two very different ideas, so even if everyone in politics were perfectly moral, their political decisions would still be affected by their views of society mixed with their 'perfect morals'. Therefore...I don't think that one would bring the other about.
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Wednesday 4/20/05 - 1:17:34 PM EST (GMT-5)
If everyone had the same morals, it would depend on what those morals were as to whether everything else would be in order.
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Monday 4/25/05 - 2:03:24 AM EST (GMT-5)
Not if morals and political boundaries clash.
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 5/22/05 - 5:21:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
I think almost the very opposite. I think it the absence of moral order which requires political order. If moral order already existed then a lot of functions for which government is need would cease to be needed. So the politicians and political order would no longer be necessary.
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 5/22/05 - 5:22:36 PM EST (GMT-5)
"for which government is need "

*is needed*

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Wednesday 8/3/05 - 4:35:09 AM EST (GMT-5)
Morality is so open ended, it can't be said whether one's morals or not can affect a society.



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 How do you pronounce ``Dawn``?

2 Are you currently menstruating?

3 Is there a good story behind your avy?

4 Is it fair that this woman got away with purposefully miscarrying her two babies?

5 Would you volunteer to be hypnotized on TV?

6 Do you have a NalgeneĀ® bottle?

7 Do you use all of your vacation days every year?

8 Are you a histrionic person?

9 If the media posted a news article with the headline "POLL: 70% voters do not believe media honest and truthful", would you believe it to be true?

10 Is all learning good learning?

More Questions
 
Edit