|
deshep
Male,
40-49
Canada
Joined: 18 yrs, 8 mos ago
219 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/03 - 8:59:27 PM EST (GMT-5)
Marriage is one thing, but how about if they get pregnant, and they then guilty of poisoning their child?
|
|
Dracino
Male,
18-29
Canada
Joined: 18 yrs, 11 mos ago
3,043 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Friday 9/12/03 - 9:03:21 PM EST (GMT-5)
I agree about the possible infection in case of pregnancy. But interestingly(and oddly) enough, there have been children born from HIV-Positive parents and are HIV-Negative. They seem to have a partial immunity to it. If they get pregnant, well, there's hope for the kid at least.
|
|
FlatoutC
Male,
18-29
Eastern US
Joined: 19 yrs, 3 mos ago
80 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Sunday 9/14/03 - 10:17:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
It should be encouraged.
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Sunday 9/14/03 - 10:21:27 PM EST (GMT-5)
Not letting HIV positive people marry does nothing towards stopping the spread of AIDS. An HIV positive person is still capable of love-making, married or not. In this case, both partners are HIV positive, so there is no risk of them spreading AIDS to each other. Most HIV couples are going to try to avoid pregnancy. |
|
hater
Female,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 8 mos ago
53 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Sunday 9/14/03 - 10:21:54 PM EST (GMT-5)
banned?!? no! it is still up to the parents whether to adopt or have a child, if they're free choice is taken away that would cause many problems. it isn't always their faults they have hiv, what if they themselves were born with the disease?
|
|
blackcrow
Male,
18-29
Australia / NZ
Joined: 19 yrs, 5 mos ago
3,849 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Sunday 9/14/03 - 10:22:08 PM EST (GMT-5)
I see nothing wrong with them being married
|
|
kengurupoika
Male,
18-29
Australia / NZ
Joined: 18 yrs, 10 mos ago
49 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 8 mos ago - Sunday 9/14/03 - 10:22:20 PM EST (GMT-5)
I see no reason why they shouldn't get married... Marriage doesn't always lead to childeren, and it's not as if unmarried childeren can't have kids....
|
|
oldrocker
Female,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 8 mos ago
490 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 7 mos ago - Thursday 10/2/03 - 12:58:25 PM EST (GMT-5)
That's dumb. Why should it be banned?
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 7 mos ago - Thursday 10/2/03 - 1:04:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
Not unless you want to ban people born with genetic diseases from getting married, and if they are going to have kids, they don't need to get married to do it. This is why we have birth control and vasectomies and so forth. |
|
Im_DiStUrBeD
Female,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 19 yrs, 8 mos ago
2,894 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 7 mos ago - Thursday 10/2/03 - 1:26:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
I don't think it should be banned.
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 7 mos ago - Thursday 10/2/03 - 2:10:44 PM EST (GMT-5)
There is medication that you can take now if you are HIV positive that can significantly decrease the chances of your offspring having HIV. Absolutely not. I think anybody, HIV positive/negative, gay/straight/, deformed/handicapped should have the right to get married. |
|
nicepockets
Female,
18-29
Southern US
Joined: 19 yrs, 5 mos ago
280 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 10/27/03 - 8:41:07 PM EST (GMT-5)
im okay with it as long as they dont procreate a sentence a child to death.
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 10/27/03 - 8:56:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
if i got HIV i'd get a vasectomy.
|
|
kornluv
Female,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 6 mos ago
336 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Tuesday 11/4/03 - 6:52:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
No, it's love.
|
|
Morguebabe
Female,
18-29
Eastern US
Joined: 19 yrs, 10 mos ago
33,093 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Tuesday 11/4/03 - 7:03:31 PM EST (GMT-5)
they shouldnt be allowed to have kids.
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Friday 11/7/03 - 3:19:26 PM EST (GMT-5)
At least they aren't off spreading HIV around, like a lot of people.
|
|
Sadie_Poet
Female,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 9 mos ago
1,963 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Friday 11/7/03 - 3:39:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
No i don't think so
|
|
hotfox
Female,
18-29
Canada
Joined: 20 yrs ago
405 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Friday 11/7/03 - 4:54:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
Who are they hurting?
|
|
randabanana
Female,
30-39
Southern US
Joined: 18 yrs, 7 mos ago
2,176 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Saturday 11/8/03 - 1:31:20 AM EST (GMT-5)
Of course they should be able to marry, but not to reproduce, which I hope most agree with.
|
|
GoManGo
Male,
70+
Western US
Joined: 19 yrs, 11 mos ago
8,945 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Saturday 11/8/03 - 1:34:32 AM EST (GMT-5)
You can't be infected a second time, I see nothing wrong with them marrying.
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Saturday 11/8/03 - 1:37:44 AM EST (GMT-5)
That just a silly question. Everyone should have the right to marry.
|
|
peanutbutter
Female,
18-29
Midwest US
Joined: 18 yrs, 9 mos ago
811 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 11/17/03 - 1:24:22 PM EST (GMT-5)
you're both aware - why not?
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Monday 11/17/03 - 1:29:14 PM EST (GMT-5)
marriage is not a right to answer the question, why not? I don't see any reason that would impeed them to wed |
|
staindgoth
Male,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 6 mos ago
2,057 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 6 mos ago - Tuesday 11/18/03 - 12:51:14 PM EST (GMT-5)
Definitely not, you don't ban marriages of cancer patients do you?
|
|
yummytoast
Female,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 18 yrs, 9 mos ago
311 Posts
|
|
|
|
18 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Monday 11/24/03 - 7:36:41 PM EST (GMT-5)
no one has the right to say that people can't get married. if they had children that would be a different story because they would be passing the disease off to their children.. but other than that i say go for it.
|
Share 
