[link] Anyone care to defend this? No? Because it`s indefensible? Right. Republicans are know-nothinging hard. Forget Trump 2024, is there going to be anyone left in the party by then?... Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Quests. | Journs. | Gen. | News | Quiz | Links | TV | Music | Movies | Games | Sports | Sug. | Lit. | Jokes | Artcls. | Newb | O.S.
Every single last Republican voted against a Neo-Nazi probe for the military.

Back to Thread List
Bottom Last Post

1 month ago - Saturday 7/16/22 - 11:58:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
Every. Last. One.

Anyone care to defend this? No? Because it's indefensible? Right. Republicans are know-nothinging hard. Forget Trump 2024, is there going to be anyone left in the party by then? Keep fxcking with nationalism, see where that lands.
1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 12:22:01 PM EST (GMT-5)
There are likely neo-Nazis in the military and police forces that need to be identified and weeded out.

In theory, it sounds like this would be a good idea, but it all depends on how they intend to probe for 'Neo-Nazis', doesn't it?

What is the potential for innocents being swept up as part of the probe and having their lives ruined?

Is this another McCarthy-like hunt for 'Communists' or can they legitimately identify those with actual Neo-Nazi connections? In this time of political extremism, I honestly wonder if this can be done in truly impartial manner.
1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 3:46:00 PM EST (GMT-5)
Of course YOU would. Anything to bitch about, deflect and stall.

You "honestly"? You are full of crap. Your name announces it every time you post.
1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 4:26:49 PM EST (GMT-5)
From the link:

"Arizona GOP congressman Andy Biggs was one of those who spoke out against the amendment, describing it as "Orwellian in nature."

"This amendment attempts to create a problem where none exists by requesting investigations into law enforcement and the armed services for alleged rampant white supremacists or white national sympathies," Biggs said."
1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 4:30:25 PM EST (GMT-5)
The police are already more hesitant to arrest a black person because they don't want to be labeled a racist. This will make them even more hesitant.

1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 7:01:11 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Sunday 7/17/22 - 12:22:01 PM CowDung wrote:
There are likely neo-Nazis in the military and police forces that need to be identified and weeded out. In theory, it sounds like this would be a good idea, but it all depends on how they intend to probe for 'Neo-Nazis', doesn't it? What is the potential for innocents being swept up as part of the probe and having their lives ruined? Is this another McCarthy-like hunt for 'Communists' or can they legitimately identify those with actual Neo-Nazi connections? In this time of political extremism, I honestly wonder if this can be done in truly impartial manner.


This literally would be done exactly the same way we search for other terrorist groups in the military it's a simple expansion of existing practice. Putting it another way, it's not anymore McCarthy-esque than the War on Terror and it's something the military asked for.
1 month ago - Sunday 7/17/22 - 7:08:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Sunday 7/17/22 - 4:30:25 PM Noldor wrote:
The police are already more hesitant to arrest a black person because they don't want to be labeled a racist. This will make them even more hesitant.


So your defense is because some dying old dog drater who has a vested interest in ensuring white supremacists stay in the military said so, you're with it?
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM EST (GMT-5)
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown. They want to spend a lot of money on nothing.
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 2:56:41 AM EST (GMT-5)
The police already have rules and policies and procedures to follow. If anyone breaks those rules, they will be fired.
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 3:35:55 AM EST (GMT-5)
It's like the 70's 80's 90's and the whole of this century never happened for Noldor.

White supremacy is "overblown" f*ck off you useless apologist dickhead.

"They" won't be fired if the chief of police and the investigating officers have white supremacist or racist influences and that's what this is all about addressing. No surprise the 2 biggest closet Nazis are defending the resistance to this transparency.
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 3:38:22 AM EST (GMT-5)
"They want to spend a whole lot of money on nothing"

Typical bullsh*t response to any initiative at all. Noldor would have opposed the voyage of the Mayflower on the same basis.
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 4:13:29 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown.

How many white supremacists do you think is an acceptable number in public service?
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 6:47:29 AM EST (GMT-5)
Noldor style "They want to spend a whole lot of money on nothing" policies

The Louisiana purchase
The Civil War
World War 1
The New Deal
Desegregation
Civil Rights
Affirmative Action
Welfare
The Watergate investigation
Medicaid
Obama anything

We need this to save 'murcia Policies

The Texas Revolution
Korea
Cuban Missile Crisis
Vietnam
Invasion of Grenada
Invasion of Iraq
Department of Homeland security
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 7:02:07 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown. They want to spend a lot of money on nothing.


It literally costs no more money than what they're already doing because they're already running background and just not reporting on White Supremacist organizations.
1 month ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 7:03:12 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:56:41 AM Noldor wrote:
The police already have rules and policies and procedures to follow. If anyone breaks those rules, they will be fired.


That's definitely not guaranteed, and usually no they aren't.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 8:09:03 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown.
On Monday 7/18/22 - 4:13:29 AM DaveW wrote:
How many white supremacists do you think is an acceptable number in public service?


Considering how many news articles he's consumed that use Neo-Nazi authorship as secondary sources in the past decade? Ass many as want to.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 8:09:37 AM EST (GMT-5)
*as but also ass.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 10:23:06 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Sunday 7/17/22 - 4:30:25 PM Noldor wrote:
The police are already more hesitant to arrest a black person because they don't want to be labeled a racist. This will make them even more hesitant.

Are you that FXCKING stupid? You just post the most ignorant and disgusting things.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 11:46:34 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown.
On Monday 7/18/22 - 4:13:29 AM DaveW wrote:
How many white supremacists do you think is an acceptable number in public service?

Do you think the police just go around arresting black people at random? There will be a trial, there will be evidence, there will be consequences for tampering with evidence or planting evidence. The police all wear body cameras now.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 11:49:08 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 6:47:29 AM Boredofu wrote:
Noldor style "They want to spend a whole lot of money on nothing" policies The Louisiana purchase The Civil War World War 1 The New Deal Desegregation Civil Rights Affirmative Action Welfare The Watergate investigation Medicaid Obama anything We need this to save 'murcia Policies The Texas Revolution Korea Cuban Missile Crisis Vietnam Invasion of Grenada Invasion of Iraq Department of Homeland security

What does this have to do with the price of tea in red China?
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 11:52:11 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown. They want to spend a lot of money on nothing.
On Monday 7/18/22 - 7:02:07 AM Kepi wrote:
It literally costs no more money than what they're already doing because they're already running background and just not reporting on White Supremacist organizations.

If they’re already running background checks, then why do they need a huge investigation to weed out the one or two people that slipped through?
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 11:53:13 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 6:47:29 AM Boredofu wrote:
Noldor style "They want to spend a whole lot of money on nothing" policies The Louisiana purchase The Civil War World War 1 The New Deal Desegregation Civil Rights Affirmative Action Welfare The Watergate investigation Medicaid Obama anything We need this to save 'murcia Policies The Texas Revolution Korea Cuban Missile Crisis Vietnam Invasion of Grenada Invasion of Iraq Department of Homeland security
On Monday 7/18/22 - 11:49:08 AM Noldor wrote:
What does this have to do with the price of tea in red China?


I could easily say the same thing about anything you wrote ever.
30 days ago - Monday 7/18/22 - 12:50:30 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 7/18/22 - 2:54:50 AM Noldor wrote:
I think this whole white supremacy threat is way overblown. They want to spend a lot of money on nothing.
On Monday 7/18/22 - 7:02:07 AM Kepi wrote:
It literally costs no more money than what they're already doing because they're already running background and just not reporting on White Supremacist organizations.
On Monday 7/18/22 - 11:52:11 AM Noldor wrote:
If they’re already running background checks, then why do they need a huge investigation to weed out the one or two people that slipped through?


Because it's not just one or two that "slipped through." These groups are constantly trying to get people in and when they do you get Atomwaffen on the back end. Like through the 80's and 90's mercenaries... Sorry military contractors... Had a huge Neo-Nazi footprint.



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Back to Thread List
Top

 
Edit