Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

3,865 hits 4.0 (1 vote) Share Favorite | Flag 10 mos ago by QueenBurns

Is the Pro-Life movement really about saving babies, or is it actually about punishing women?


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Bottom Last Post

10 months ago - Sunday 1/1/17 - 9:37:28 PM EST (GMT-5)
Give me your honest opinion.
10 months ago - Monday 1/2/17 - 3:37:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
while their intent is to save babies, it also leads to problems down the line like overpopulation.

even if all wealth and resources were distributed equally, a population growing out of control wouldn't be a good idea for the sustainability of society.
10 months ago - Monday 1/2/17 - 3:56:15 PM EST (GMT-5)
if it was about saving babies, they would do something for them after they are born.
10 months ago - Monday 1/2/17 - 6:34:58 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/2/17 - 3:56:15 PM Abzurd wrote:
if it was about saving babies, they would do something for them after they are born.


What is it that 'they' aren't doing after they are born?

10 months ago - Monday 1/2/17 - 8:43:49 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/2/17 - 3:56:15 PM Abzurd wrote:
if it was about saving babies, they would do something for them after they are born.
On Monday 1/2/17 - 6:34:58 PM CowDung wrote:
What is it that 'they' aren't doing after they are born?


10 months ago - Monday 1/2/17 - 10:17:43 PM EST (GMT-5)
Thanks- - I've heard the statement many times, and never understood what parts of the Conservative platform it was referring to.
10 months ago - Tuesday 1/3/17 - 6:51:54 PM EST (GMT-5)
It's supposed to be about "saving" unborn children. I think both sides of the abortion debate get way out of hand.
10 months ago - Tuesday 1/3/17 - 10:41:25 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/2/17 - 10:17:43 PM CowDung wrote:
Thanks- - I've heard the statement many times, and never understood what parts of the Conservative platform it was referring to.

Clearly, it's referring to the part about reducing welfare benefits, particularly for families and single parents with children.
10 months ago - Wednesday 1/4/17 - 7:29:26 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/2/17 - 3:56:15 PM Abzurd wrote:
if it was about saving babies, they would do something for them after they are born.

Oddly, everyone I know that is involved in *any* pro-life demonstrations or movements spends some of their time, if not not significantly more time than protesting abortion, volunteering for and financially supporting groups that provided all those things George just said they are against: neonatal care, day care, head start, or directly helping mothers with unplanned newborns (buying baby needs, food, etc.).

And every Crisis Pregnancy Center that I know of, including the one I supported for years, devotes as much or more resources to helping women who have had unplanned babies as it does to counseling and treating women who are pregnant.

People who make the above insane claims are being willfully ignorant. Take a 2 minute internet search.
10 months ago - Wednesday 1/4/17 - 7:38:45 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Monday 1/2/17 - 10:17:43 PM CowDung wrote:
Thanks- - I've heard the statement many times, and never understood what parts of the Conservative platform it was referring to.
On Tuesday 1/3/17 - 10:41:25 PM Raisinman wrote:
Clearly, it's referring to the part about reducing welfare benefits, particularly for families and single parents with children.


...but a reduction of welfare benefits isn't what conservatives are really seeking. The goal is to reform a system that tends to make welfare a lifestyle rather than a safety net. The thinking is that those families will benefit more from having work and being self supporting rather than trapped collecting welfare checks forever.

10 months ago - Wednesday 1/4/17 - 6:01:33 PM EST (GMT-5)
But if you can't quote a celebrity on it, is it really true?

I think many, if not a majority, of pro-life individuals actually mean well.
10 months ago - Thursday 1/5/17 - 6:51:41 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 1/4/17 - 7:29:26 AM dacash wrote:
Oddly, everyone I know that is involved in *any* pro-life demonstrations or movements spends some of their time, if not not significantly more time than protesting abortion, volunteering for and financially supporting groups that provided all those things George just said they are against: neonatal care, day care, head start, or directly helping mothers with unplanned newborns (buying baby needs, food, etc.).

Of the pro-life people I know, none of them are devoted to any other causes, with the exception of opposing the death penalty. Certainly none are involved in any of the areas you listed and some even actively oppose family planning (birth control).

I do agree with Ghoul that most pro-life supporters mean well. But my anecdotal experiences differ from yours.
10 months ago - Thursday 1/5/17 - 9:13:40 AM EST (GMT-5)
Maybe you need to upgrade your crowd, Spoonerism. When you say devoted - are they giving money? Or is it that when they participate in conversations pro-life how they come out, or do they actually go protest and carry signs?

I'm really curious, because most of the folks I know that are prolife with any degree of seriousness are from church.
10 months ago - Thursday 1/5/17 - 10:32:53 AM EST (GMT-5)
To be fair, I'm limiting this only to people I know well enough to speak to their charitable givings in both time/money. Which isn't a lot of people. And they are known from former church connections. They go and protest at both anti-abortion and anti-death penalty rallies. But in conversations, they are not supportive of services for young, unwed mothers, citing that such services encourage young people to engage in sexual activity. And they're vehemently opposed to birth control from a religious standpoint.

Again, this isn't to say that all pro-lifers are like this. But just that your experiences are not universal.
10 months ago - Thursday 1/5/17 - 1:11:30 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wow. The only 2 couples I know that are anti-birth control for religious reasons. One set are co-workers here at the orphanage and raise children of unwed mothers (that's where most orphans in this country come from). In the other, the woman regularly volunteers at a crisis pregnancy center and her job there is working with unwed mothers and helping provide for their needs.

I realize my experiences are not universal. In every movement of any size there are going to be whacky fringe elements. And that's where I'd place the people you know. If they spouted those ideas in any church I've ever been to, they'd be shut down pretty fast by the leadership. Their stance is as about as contrary to biblical principle as I can come up with. They are punishing children for their parent's sin (and not even thinking that the parent might need forgiveness).
10 months ago - Thursday 1/5/17 - 1:12:58 PM EST (GMT-5)
We tossed a pastor from a church once over view very similar to that (he wouldn't dedicate a child because the mother - an openly repentant daughter of one of the church members - wasn't married). You can disagree with me over my ideas that sex outside of marriage is a sin. But the same book that calls it a sin, says that we are called to forgive one another - no excuses.

Sorry for going on about it. It just really irritates me when I hear about stuff like that being done in the name of Christianity.
10 months ago - Friday 1/6/17 - 1:47:12 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 1/4/17 - 6:01:33 PM _Ghoul_ wrote:
But if you can't quote a celebrity on it, is it really true? I think many, if not a majority, of pro-life individuals actually mean well.


and they do, they're not bad people at all. it's when people get militant about it is where i draw the line. like those guys killing abortion doctors and people blocking the entrances of abortion clinics. it's not like abortion or birth control is some mandated thing that the government is pushing on people.
10 months ago - Friday 1/6/17 - 1:49:23 PM EST (GMT-5)
as much as i may disagree with pro-life people's opinions, i don't think that they're sincerely aiming to actively punish women; i think it is just people with a different point of view about where human life begins having strong opinions about that. sure some of them can be psychopathic assholes but i don't think it necessarily stems from misogyny
10 months ago - Friday 1/6/17 - 1:51:25 PM EST (GMT-5)
there's a lot of disagreement on where life begins, at least from my experience from talking with pro-life people. some say it's when the sperm meets the egg, others say when you can feel a fetus's heartbeat.
10 months ago - Saturday 1/7/17 - 11:03:41 AM EST (GMT-5)
Every sperm is sacred



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 If a defendant is found `not guilty`, do you assume that they are innocent?

2 Should transgender people use the bathroom of the gender on their birth certificates, or by what gender they most look like?

3 Have you ever gotten a small loan of a million dollars?

4 Have you ever been in a fist fight before?

5 Is Rock and Roll here to stay?

6 Would you rather have no elbows or no knees?

7 Do you think Donald Trump will become the president of the United States?

8 Is Squidward`s skin color blue or green?

9 Has anyone from youthink ever been on Jeopardy?

10 Are you a dedicated follower of fashion?

More Questions
Friends
Daily Moment of Joy
Personality Quizzes
Funny Videos
I-Am-Bored.com
Free IQ Test
The Impossible Quiz
Intelligence Test
Relationship Test
Doodie Cartoons
 
Edit