|
|
6 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Wednesday 12/20/06 - 11:41:45 PM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Sunday 12/24/06 - 4:44:01 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wow what a wild case. This'll be fun to see. Cheney on the stand, oh how i hope i see it. If they settle i just hope they make less than a million.
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Friday 2/9/07 - 1:01:15 PM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 2/11/07 - 12:06:20 AM EST (GMT-5)
Hang himself? Wasn't the source of the leak already revealed to be Richard Armitage? Cheney, Libby, et al have nothing to do with the leaking of Plame's identity...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 2/11/07 - 12:18:53 AM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Sunday 2/11/07 - 10:44:34 AM EST (GMT-5)
Every source has a different story for it - Truthout leans to the left so they've been posting a lot of articles about Cheney and Libby authorizing the leak. I haven't seen Fox News' take on it. They probably have nothing about it on their site, many times I've gone there to get their side of a major story and they aren't even reporting on it.
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Monday 2/12/07 - 9:59:57 AM EST (GMT-5)
On 2/11/2007 10:44:35 AM KikiPeepers wrote: Every source has a different story for it - Truthout leans to the left so they've been posting a lot of articles about Cheney and Libby authorizing the leak. I haven't seen Fox News' take on it. They probably have nothing about it on their site, many times I've gone there to get their side of a major story and they aren't even reporting on it. | I would think that Novak's article would be the one that mattered--he was the guy that put Plame's identity in his article. He named Armitage as his source. The lefties post a bunch of articles about Cheney and Libby as authorizing the leak because they want to attack the administration. The fact that it was Armitage that did the leaking pretty much clears everyone in the Bush administration...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Wednesday 2/21/07 - 10:11:45 PM EST (GMT-5)
It all seems confusing.
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Wednesday 2/21/07 - 10:24:50 PM EST (GMT-5)
Yeah it is, I think because they probably aren't giving us the whole story
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Thursday 3/1/07 - 7:46:19 PM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Friday 3/2/07 - 2:35:06 PM EST (GMT-5)
Have they gotten around to charging Richard Armitage for leaking Plame's identity yet?
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Friday 3/2/07 - 3:30:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
Not yet I don't think!
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Friday 3/2/07 - 4:07:50 PM EST (GMT-5)
On 3/2/2007 3:30:54 PM KikiPeepers wrote: Not yet I don't think! | What's taking them so long? The Lefties were all foaming at the mouth and demanding speedy convictions for Rove, Cheney, GWB, et al. back when this all started. I'm thinking that people are finally realizing that no crime has been committed by leaking the name...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Saturday 3/3/07 - 12:16:18 AM EST (GMT-5)
On 3/2/2007 8:34:00 PM KikiPeepers wrote: On 3/2/2007 4:07:50 PM CowDung wrote: What's taking them so long? The Lefties were all foaming at the mouth and demanding speedy convictions for Rove, Cheney, GWB, et al. They want to know what 'reasonable doubt' is. Give me a break! Libby Jurors: Define 'Reasonable Doubt' | What does 'reasonable doubt' have to do with my question? It seems pretty obvious that the whole thing was nothing more than a witch hunt. Once it came out that the leak came from outside the Bush administration, nobody cared about it anymore...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Saturday 3/3/07 - 1:34:32 AM EST (GMT-5)
You asked when they'd be done and that's all I know - it's going to next week because the jurors don't understand reasonable doubt. How can you be an American and not have an idea of what that is?! You know there's just one guy holding out like Twelve Angry Men.
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Saturday 3/3/07 - 8:16:16 AM EST (GMT-5)
I asked when they would be getting around to charging Armitage for the "high crime" of leaking Plame's identity. I guess there must have been a disconnect between my posts...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Saturday 3/3/07 - 1:50:01 PM EST (GMT-5)
Ooh I think we are confusing each other here! It's a very confusing issue anyway...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Saturday 3/3/07 - 10:18:43 PM EST (GMT-5)
I don't think it's confusing at all. It's clearly a case of the Lefties trying to nail someone in the Bush administration for something. When it comes out that the Administration is clean, the Lefties forgot all about the issue...
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Sunday 3/4/07 - 6:17:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
I don't like defining people as 'lefties' or 'righties'. Any person, if trying to destroy an opponent or political opponent, will pull low blows. I'm not a fan of Clinton by any stretch of the imagination, but the 'righties' did the same thing to him. Every presidency has scandals concocted by the other party. Although, some are valid. We'll see if this one is!
|
|
|
6 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Sunday 3/4/07 - 11:44:36 PM EST (GMT-5)
I certainly didn't hear too many 'Righties' yelling for Rove's head on a platter when the news of the identity leak came out... I think we already see that this one is not valid. If it were, Armitage would be standing trial right now.
|
|
|
4 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/20/08 - 12:12:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
|
|
|
4 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/20/08 - 12:59:16 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Friday 6/20/08 - 12:12:02 PM KikiPeepers wrote: I hope they're going DOWN! [link] |
They would only be going down if an actual crime were committed...
|
|
|
4 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/20/08 - 3:50:14 PM EST (GMT-5)
I believe a crime was committed - by several people
|
|
|
4 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/20/08 - 6:18:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Friday 6/20/08 - 3:50:14 PM KikiPeepers wrote: I believe a crime was committed - by several people |
then why hasn't ANYONE been brought up on criminal charges (including the guy who admitted to being the leaker- - Armitage)?
|
|
|
4 yrs ago, 11 mos ago - Friday 6/20/08 - 9:34:10 PM EST (GMT-5)
$$$$$$$$$$
|