|
|
16 yrs ago, 5 mos ago - Saturday 9/25/04 - 5:53:16 PM EST (GMT-5)
YEs.
|
|
robwho
Male,
40-49
S. America
Joined: 16 yrs, 4 mos ago
10 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Monday 9/27/04 - 4:54:09 PM EST (GMT-5)
No. Look at Hisory people. Successfuyl corporations, in the long run, are those that take care of their assets, i.e. workers. Look at Schweppes Cadbury for an example (a successful corporation I think)
|
|
scrabbler
Female,
18-29
Eastern US
Joined: 16 yrs, 5 mos ago
131 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 4 mos ago - Thursday 9/30/04 - 10:44:47 AM EST (GMT-5)
Not at all. Do you know the definition of the word "oxymoron?" If the definition of the word "corporation" was "not socially responsible," then it would be an oxymoron. Just because *many* corporations are not socially responsible doesn't mean that "corporate social responsibility" is oxymoronic. They two ideas (that of a corporation and that of social responsibility) are orthogonal.
|
|
abcz
Female,
13-17
Australia / NZ
Joined: 16 yrs, 4 mos ago
26 Posts
|
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 3 mos ago - Friday 11/12/04 - 4:44:41 AM EST (GMT-5)
what's an 'oxymoron'?!?!?!
|
|
|
16 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Thursday 12/16/04 - 8:22:39 PM EST (GMT-5)
not at all. corperations are made up of people. people are part of society.
|
|
|
16 yrs ago - Tuesday 2/15/05 - 12:17:22 AM EST (GMT-5)
^^What the hell does that mean?
|
Share 
